Judgment Header
Winston Lee Siew Boon v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 186
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 186
[2015] SGHC 186
General Division of the High Court of Singapore20 Jul 2015Magistrate's Appeal No 111 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“e the facts did not reveal intrusion of the victim’s sexual organs (eg, Lee Siew Boon Winston v Public Prosecutor [2015] 4 SLR 1184 (see the full judgment in Winston Lee Siew Boon v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 186); Public Prosecutor v Ho Ah Hoo Steven [2007] SGDC 162; and Zeng Guoyuan), a retributive element in sent”
“While the evidence must be considered holistically, I reiterate Chan J’s view in Winston Lee Siew Boon v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 186, at [73(a)], that “[t]he legal burden on the prosecution remains to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is the ultimate question that the court has to determine after a holi”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 111 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-07-20
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.