Judgment Header
Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple [2015] SGHC 192
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 192
[2015] SGHC 192
General Division of the High Court of Singapore23 Jul 2015Originating Summons 1049 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“the Appellant had no standing to bring the claim because it had failed to prove that it was the same entity (albeit in registered form) as Chee Hock Keng Temple (see Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple [2015] SGHC 192 (“the Judgment”)). The Appellant then filed the present appeal against the Judge’s decision.”
“he constitution does not confer. Art 16.1 also makes no express reference to any power of suspension. In fact, a provision very similar to art 16.1 was considered in Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple [2015] SGHC 192 (“Chee Hock Keng”), where it was held at [52] per Aedit Abdullah JC (as he then was) that:”
“ence to any disciplinary powers of the ExCo or a general meeting of members. In fact, as the plaintiff points out, a similar provision was considered in the cases of Chee Hock Keng v Chu Sheng Temple [2015] SGHC 192 (“Chee Hock Keng”) and Singapore Rifle Association.”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons 1049 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-07-23
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.