[2015] SGHC 193

“outine after ensuring that the right type and quantity of the drugs go into the right packaging” – in other words, someone like Farid – would certainly not be: Public Prosecutor v Yogaras Poongavanam [2015] SGHC 193 at [28]. This distinction explained the outcome in Public Prosecutor v Siva a/l Sannasi [2015] SGHC 73,”

“e kind of packing contemplated by the Court of Appeal was someone who packs by “ensuring that the right type and quantity of drugs go into the right packaging” Public Prosecutor v Yogaras Poongavanam [2015] SGHC 193 (“Yogaras”) at [28]; it is the kind of packing that facilitates further distribution or sale. Hence, seg”

“In the subsequent case of Public Prosecutor v Yogaras Poongavanam [2015] SGHC 193 (“Yogaras”), the offender was charged with the offence under s 7 of the MDA for importation of three packets of diamorphine into Singapore, having arrived in Singapore from Malaysia on a motorcycle.”

“had admitted to having repacked heroin into smaller packets between 7.7 and 7.9g for the previous consignments. The Judge was of the view (at [64]), following Public Prosecutor v Yogaras Poongavanam [2015] SGHC 193 at [28], that Farid was “someone who packs drugs into bundles as a routine after ensuring that the right”