Judgment Header
Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (SATS Security Services Pte Ltd, third party) [2015] SGHC 289
Loading…
[2015] SGHC 289
General Division of the High Court of Singapore4 Nov 2015Suit No 484 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“vour of Mr Goel and awarded him S$45,915.74 in damages, which was a fraction of his claim amount: see Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (SATS Security Services Pte Ltd, third party) [2015] SGHC 289 (“the Liability Judgment”) at [50]. In particular, the Judge held that RWS’s security officers were 80%”
“sault and battery. Alleged participants in these torts included auxiliary police officers employed by SATS Security Services Pte Ltd (“SATS”). As such, the respondent joined SATS as a third party. In [2015] SGHC 289 (“the Liability Judgment”), the High Court Judge (“the Judge”) found in favour of the applicant, and awa”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (SATS Security Services Pte Ltd, third party) [2015] SGHC 289
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 484 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-11-04
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.