[2015] SGHC 293

“The High Court recognised in Aik Heng Contracts and Services Pte Ltd v Deshin Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 293 (“Aik Heng”) at [24] that not all breaches of natural justice warrant the setting aside of an adjudication determination. There must be a material breach of natural justice.”

“ll justify setting aside an adjudication determination. Only material breaches of natural justice will suffice: see Aik Heng Contracts and Services Pte Ltd v Deshin Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 293 (“Aik Heng”) at [24] and Metropole at [62].”

“the material that was properly before the [a]djudicator” (at [54]). This was similarly stated by Lee Seiu Kin J in Aik Heng Contracts and Services Pte Ltd v Deshin Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 293 where he noted that patent errors were those that were “on the face of that material” [emphasis omitted]”

“ontractors Pte Ltd and another appeal [2013] 1 SLR 125 (“L W Infrastructure”) at [54]. Similarly, Lee Seiu Kin J in Aik Heng Contracts and Services Pte Ltd v Deshin Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 293 at [26], which case was referred to in Metropole at [63], positively cited Watpac Constructions v Austin”

“iently material as to cause prejudice to the aggrieved party in the adjudication. This much was first recognised in Aik Heng Contracts and Services Pte Ltd v Deshin Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 293, when Lee Seiu Kin J affirmed and applied the decisions of the courts in England and in New South Wales”