[2015] SGHC 310

“he background facts leading to the Appellant’s arrest have been covered comprehensively in the decision of the judge below (“the Judge”), which may be found at Public Prosecutor v Iskandar bin Rahmat [2015] SGHC 310 (“the Judgment”). Most of the facts are not disputed by the parties and we do not propose to repeat them”

“On 4 December 2015, Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) convicted Mr Iskandar on both charges and sentenced him to suffer death: PP v Iskandar bin Rahmat [2015] SGHC 310 (“Iskandar (HC)”) at [101] and [105].”

“On 4 December 2015, Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) convicted Mr Iskandar on both charges and sentenced him to suffer death (see Public Prosecutor v Iskandar bin Rahmat [2015] SGHC 310). Mr Iskandar’s appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed on 3 February 2017 (see Iskandar bin Rahmat v Public Prosecu”

“a) of the Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed). At the end of the trial, he was convicted on both counts and sentenced accordingly to the mandatory death penalty: Public Prosecutor v Iskandar bin Rahmat [2015] SGHC 310 (“Iskandar HC”). The Appellant then appealed against his convictions to this court. That appeal was dism”

“2008 Rev Ed) (“Penal Code”). Both charges attract the death penalty and he was sentenced accordingly. The grounds of decision of the High Court are set out in Public Prosecutor v Iskandar bin Rahmat [2015] SGHC 310.”