[2015] SGHC 4

“ah had knowledge of the drugs concealed in the Black Luggage. At the end of the trial, the Judge acquitted the Applicant but convicted Hamidah (see Public Prosecutor v Hamidah Binte Awang and another [2015] SGHC 4).”

“trial. At the end of the trial, on 5 November 2014, I acquitted Ilechukwu of the charge against him. My written grounds of decision is reported in Public Prosecutor v Hamidah Binte Awang and another [2015] SGHC 4 (“HC (Acquittal)”).”

“The Applicant was acquitted of the charge against him in Public Prosecutor v Hamidah Binte Awang and another [2015] SGHC 4 (hereinafter, “HC (Acquittal)”). The Judge had, at [48], accepted the Applicant’s testimony that he came to Singapore to purchase electronic goods for his business. This was corroborated by the US$”

“re principle requires the court to examine which jurisdiction is better placed to decide on the issues concerning the welfare of the child. In the seminal decision of the Family Division in TDX v TDY [2015] SGHC 4 (“TDX v TDY”), Debbie Ong JC (as she then was) observed (at [15]) as follows:”