[2015] SGHC 99

“(“TLP”), “Tat Leong Investment” and “Tat Leong Development” (“TLD”) (collectively, the “TL Entities”). The background to the TL Entities can be found in Lin Choo Mee v Tat Leong Development (Pte) Ltd [2015] SGHC 99.”

“he Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) (“the Companies Act”), ie, on the basis that it was just and equitable to do so: see Lin Choo Mee v Tat Leong Development (Pte) Ltd and Others and Other Matters [2015] SGHC 99 (“the Judgment”) at [26]. The plaintiff argued inter alia that the relationship of mutual trust and confi”

“Chow Kwok Chuen and Lin Choo Mee v Tat Leong Development (Pte) Ltd and Others and Other Matters [2015] SGHC 99 (“Lin Choo Mee”), relied upon by Ms Ma, were of no assistance to her case. Chow Kwok Chuen involved three brothers who were co-directors of three family companies set up by their late father. In Lin”

“sts and disbursements to be reflected solely against the value of LSE’s shares in the TL Companies (“the Costs Order”): see Lin Choo Mee v Tat Leong Development (Pte) Ltd and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 99 (“the Winding Up Judgment”).”

“established in respect of family businesses due to the circumstances in which they were formed and managed. For example, in Lin Choo Mee v Tat Leong Development (Pte) Ltd and Others and Other Matters [2015] SGHC 99, the court held (at [75]) that the family companies were akin to a quasi-partnership for three reasons: (”