para
The final valuation of Kiri’s shares in DyStar
Loading…
[2021] SGHC(I) 6
Singapore International Commercial Court21 Jun 2021Suit No 4 of 2017
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“SICC determined that for the purposes of its buy-out order Kiri’s shares should be valued at US$481.6 million as at 3 July 2018: see Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another [2021] SGHC(I) 6. The latter valuation is now under appeal.”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
“(c) On 21 December 2020, in Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another [2020] SGHC(I) 27 (the “Valuation Judgment”), we provided an interim valuation of DyStar. We found DyStar’s equity value to be US$1,636m as at the valuation date, subject to further adjustments (the Valuation Judgment”
“(e) On 3 June 2021, in Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another [2021] SGHC(I) 2 (the “Valuation Judgment No 2”), we addressed the nine outstanding adjustments to be made to DyStar’s interim valuation. The parties’ experts were directed to tender an agreed calculation for DyStar’”
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
para
The final valuation of Kiri’s shares in DyStar
1
This is our decision on the final value of the 37.57% shareholding of Kiri Industries Ltd (“Kiri”) in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (“DyStar”). Our decision herein is the culmination of the following judgments:
para
(a) On 3 July 2018, in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd and others and another suit [2018] 5 SLR 1 (the “Main Judgment”), we held (i) at [281(a)] that Senda International Capital Ltd (“Senda”) was to purchase Kiri’s 37.57% shareholding in DyStar (“Kiri’s shares”) based on a valuation to be assessed, and (ii) at [281(b)] that Kiri’s shares were to be valued as at the date of the Main Judgment, ie, 3 July 2018 (“the valuation date”). Our findings in the Main Judgment were upheld on appeal in Senda International Capital Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd and others and another appeal [2019] 2 SLR 1.
para
(b) On 12 March 2019, in Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another [2019] 4 SLR 1, we held, inter alia, that no minority discount for lack of control should be applied to the valuation of Kiri’s shares. This decision was upheld on appeal in Senda International Capital Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd and others [2020] 2 SLR 1.
para
(c) On 21 December 2020, in Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another [2020] SGHC(I) 27 (the “Valuation Judgment”), we provided an interim valuation of DyStar. We found DyStar’s equity value to be US$1,636m as at the valuation date, subject to further adjustments (the Valuation Judgment at [156] and [312]). Nine issues remained outstanding, pertaining to the adjustments to be made to DyStar’s interim valuation.
para
(d) On 17 March 2021, in an oral judgment, we addressed the issues of (i) pre-judgment interest, and (ii) the relief to which Kiri would be entitled if Senda failed to comply with the buy-out order made in [281(a)] of the Main Judgment.
para
(e) On 3 June 2021, in Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another [2021] SGHC(I) 2 (the “Valuation Judgment No 2”), we addressed the nine outstanding adjustments to be made to DyStar’s interim valuation. The parties’ experts were directed to tender an agreed calculation for DyStar’s final valuation based on our findings (Valuation Judgment No 2 at [69]).
2
On 16 June 2021, pursuant to our directions, the parties’ experts tendered an agreed calculation for DyStar’s final valuation. The parties’ experts agreed that the value of Kiri’s shares as at the valuation date is US$481.6m.
3
Based on the above, we adjudge the final valuation of Kiri’s shares to be US$481.6m for the purposes of the buy-out order made at [281(a)] of the Main Judgment.
para
Costs
Costs
The Supreme Court Registry will issue directions to parties on the issue of costs.
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.