[2014] SGHCR 5

“ontracts where some of the terms have been recorded in writing and some have not (s 4(4) of the Act; Qingjian International (South Pacific) Group Development Co Pte Ltd v Capstone Engineering Pte Ltd [2014] SGHCR 5 at [35]).”

“t (if even more latitude is to be accorded) by the end of the week commencing 20 July 2020 (see also Qingjian International (South Pacific) Group Development Co Pte Ltd v Capstone Engineering Pte Ltd [2014] SGHCR 5 at [18]-[26]). Accordingly, the taking out of SUM 3558 by the defendant on 21 August 2020 would amount to”

“actually delivered to and received by the Defendant … and not any earlier” (at [47]). Similarly, in Qingjian International (South Pacific) Group Development Co Pte Ltd v Capstone Engineering Pte Ltd [2014] SGHCR 5, the plaintiff had discharged its burden of proving that it had received an order granting leave from the”

“(b) Second, Q&Q relies on Qingjian International (South Pacific) Group Development Co Pte Ltd v Capstone Engineering Pte Ltd [2014] SGHCR 5 where the learned Assistant Registrar (“AR”) noted at [45] that the communications in writing there include written quotations. However, the AR was referencing written quotations i”