[2014] SGHCR 6

“Ling relied on an AR’s decision in Tang Yong Kiat Rickie v Sinesinga Sdn Bhd and others [2014] SGHCR 6 to submit that in addition to the requirements stated in ss 123(1)(c) or (d), the court must also be satisfied that the bankruptcy order ought to be annulled when all relevant circumstances are consi”

“In Tang Yong Kiat Rickie v Sinesinga Sdh Bhd (transferee to part of the assets of United Merchant Finance Bhd) and others [2014] SGHCR 6 (“Rickie Tang”) at [13(d)], AR Paul Chan Wei Sern cited Stanger for the proposition that a bankruptcy order ought not to be made if the debtor was dead at the time proceedings were co”

“ion to dismiss bankruptcy proceedings can be invoked, the High Court decision of Tang Yong Kiat Rickie v Sinesinga Sdn Bhd (transferee to part of the assets of United Merchant Finance Bhd) and others [2014] SGHCR 6 is instructive. The court (at [12]) summarised foreign cases in which a bankruptcy petition was dismissed”

“sent purposes, is s 392(1)(a) of the IRDA. This involves a two-step assessment (Tang Yong Kiat Rickie v Singesinga Sdn Bhd (transferee to part of the assets of United Merchant Finance Bhd) and others [2014] SGHCR 6 (“Tang Yong Kiat Rickie”) at [13]):”

“ion to dismiss bankruptcy proceedings can be invoked, the High Court decision of Tang Yong Kiat Rickie v Sinesinga Sdn Bhd (transferee to part of the assets of United Merchant Finance Bhd) and others [2014] SGHCR 6 is instructive. The court (at [12]) summarised foreign cases in which a bankruptcy petition was dismissed”