Judgment Header
Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd v Koh Wee Meng [2015] SGHCR 6
Court DecisionSGHCR
[2015] SGHCR 6
[2015] SGHCR 6
High Court of Singapore26 Mar 2015Bill of Costs No 247 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“00,000 have generally been allowed only in matters involving highly specialised and/or novel points of law, with multiple factual and/or expert witnesses (citing Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd v Koh Wee Meng [2015] SGHCR 6 (“Trans Eurokars”) at [25] and Lin Jian Wei and anor v Lim Eng Hock Peter [2011] 3 SLR 1052). For example”
“lloquially known as the “two counsel rule”, which provides that the costs of more than two solicitors shall not be allowed unless the court orders otherwise (see Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd v Koh Wee Meng [2015] SGHCR 6 at [22]). In this regard, it has been observed that a Certificate of Three Counsel should only be granted”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Bill of Costs No 247 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-03-26
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.