Mr Speaker, Sir, I beg to move, "That the Bill be now read a Second time." Sir, in 1959 when the Government embarked on transferring Singapore's economy on to an industrial base, we determined that the large proportion of the workforce would in due course be industrially employed. This meant that the development of a skilled industrial workforce would assume growing importance, as Singapore's national income became increasingly dependent on the output and productivity of industry. Industrial training has therefore been recognised as a major instrument of economic policy. Thus, as a matter of national urgency, the National Industrial Training Council was established in April 1968 to deal with the immediate problem of developing and co-ordinating technical education and industrial training to meet this need. Two months later the Technical Education Department was specially formed within the Ministry of Education to execute the targets established by the Council. In the short space of four years, the Technical Education Department has substantially achieved the initial targets set out and laid a firm foundation for the development of a skilled industrial workforce. Sir, I should like, at this juncture, to correct certain mis-impressions about our vocational institute graduates and the value of the training they have received, which would otherwise undermine what has so far been accomplished. Before the new vocational institutes were established, the main supply of workers with any vocational training at all came from the vocational schools. Because of the similar name, vocational institutes have often been confused with vocational schools, which now no longer exist. This confusion is most unfortunate. Admittedly, many former vocational school students were drop-outs from the school system. The vocational institutes, on the other hand, cater for those with a reasonably high level of education who wish to learn a practical skill. Industries show a distinct preference for these graduates. The value of their training has also been recognised by the Public Service Commission. The vocational institute graduates have been trained at heavy public subsidy specially to undertake industrial employment and I am, therefore, naturally perturbed lest doubts about their value should take hold. No effort has been spared to explain to the public, through the mass media and other means, the many developments which have taken place in industrial training since 1968. Any misconceptions and prejudices which still persist, even among a small sector of the population, could be very damaging. The best way to stamp out these unfavourable attitudes and to ensure that training programmes receive the fullest acceptance and recognition is to develop close co-operation between the Government, industry and labour. The growth of such co-operation will become increasingly necessary in the next stage of industrial training, as it is envisaged that the further skill-development of the basic-trained worker can most effectively be undertaken by and within industry. It is for these reasons that an Industrial Training Board is being proposed to centralise, co-ordinate and intensify industrial training. A statutory board will enable industry and labour to participate more fully towards common goals. It will have more flexibility in an area where slowness to respond to changing conditions can result in high training wastage on the one hand and critical skill shortages on the other. A board will also be better able to deal with the problems of disseminating the right kind of conceptions about industrial training. When the responsibility for industrial training becomes vested in the Board, technical education in schools will remain the responsibility of the Ministry. The Technical Education Department, with all its functions taken over, will then be dissolved. Mr Speaker, Sir, this Bill is essentially a straightforward Bill. Its main purpose has already been outlined in the Explanatory Statement, and I do not wish to go into the details again. While industrial training is primarily the responsibility of industry, it is imperative to ensure that national interests are served. A major function of the Board will be to encourage industry to play its proper role in the national industrial training effort. It is envisaged that the future pattern of industrial training to be promoted by the Industrial Training Board will be as follows: -
(1) The training of operatives and artisans will gradually be transferred back to industry. (2) On the other hand, the further development of the necessary training capacity for the required output of skilled manpower, both institutionally and within industry, will be a major preoccupation of the Board. (3) The Board will increase the supply of persons institutionally trained up to Trade Certificate and Industrial Technician Certificate levels. (4) The further skill-development of the basic-trained worker will be accomplished by the employer with the help of the Board through on-the-job training and, wherever possible, within the framework of an apprenticeship training scheme. (5) The emphasis in industrial training will be placed on the attainment of recognised standards. The Government envisages that the Industrial Training Board will develop a national system of trade testing. This will not only improve the quality of training but also establish uniformity of standards within the work-force. (6) The upgrading of adult skilled workers will be progressively achieved through programmes of off-the-job Industrial Training (OJIT), based on the module system already introduced. (7) To cater for the smaller industries, group training schemes, encompassing both apprenticeship training and OJIT, will be developed for the upgrading of key personnel, and finally, (8) The promotion of apprenticeship training itself will be a primary concern of the Board. It will be apparent, from what I have just outlined, that apprenticeship schemes will feature increasingly in industrial training. The Government is giving consideration to introducing legislation to promote and regulate apprenticeship training at some future date. The Government will look forward to the views and recommendations of the Industrial Training Board, when formed, on the detailed provisions that will be necessary. It is anticipated that the legislation will cover the definition of apprenticeable trades, the forms and conduct of the training to be undertaken, and the responsibilities of both employer and apprentice, including the period of indenture. The Industrial Training Board will then become the chief agency for the implementation of apprenticeship training. Sir, I beg to move. Question proposed. 3.08 p.m.