Sedition (Repeal) Bill

by deleting sub‑paragraph (i) of section 44(1)(c) and substituting the following sub‑paragraph:“(i)any material which forms the subject matter of a charge under section 267C, 298A or 505 of the Penal Code; or”;

by deleting the item relating to section 267C in the First Schedule and substituting the following item:“267CUttering words, making document, etc., containing incitement to violence, etc.May arrest without warrantWarrantNot bailableImprisonment for 5 years, or fine, or bothMagistrate’s Court or District Court”;

by deleting the words “Shall not arrest without warrant” under the third column in the item relating to section 298 in the First Schedule and substituting the words “May arrest without warrant”;

by deleting the item relating to section 298A in the First Schedule and substituting the following item:“298APromoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion or race, and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmonyMay arrest without warrantSummonsNot bailableImprisonment for 3 years, or fine, or bothMagistrate’s Court or District Court”; and

by deleting the item relating to section 505 in the First Schedule and substituting the following item:“505False statement, rumour, etc., circulated with intent to cause mutiny or offence against the public peaceMay arrest without warrantWarrantNot bailableImprisonment for 3 years, or fine, or bothMagistrate’s Court or District Court”.

This section applies where a person —

utters any words, or makes any sign or visible representation;

places before a person any object;

posts, publishes, distributes, sells or offers for sale any document; or

communicates any electronic record,containing any incitement to violence, counselling disobedience to the law or to a lawful order of a public servant, or likely to lead to any breach of the peace, and the person does so —

intending for violence, disobedience to the law or such lawful order, or breach of the peace to occur; or

knowing or having reason to believe that violence, disobedience to the law or such lawful order, or breach of the peace, is likely to occur as a result.(2) This section also applies where a person —

makes, prints or otherwise reproduces, imports, possesses or has under the person’s control any document mentioned in subsection (1), for the purpose of posting, publishing, distributing, selling or offering for sale that document; or

makes any electronic record mentioned in subsection (1) for the purpose of communicating that electronic record,and the person does so —

intending for violence, disobedience to the law or such lawful order, or breach of the peace to occur by the carrying out of the purpose mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b), as the case may be; or

knowing or having reason to believe that violence, disobedience to the law or such lawful order, or breach of the peace, is likely to occur by the carrying out of that purpose.(3) The person in subsection (1) or (2) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be punished on conviction with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 5 years, or with fine, or with both.(4) In subsection (1), “counselling disobedience to the law or to a lawful order of a public servant” includes (but is not limited to) providing instruction, advice or information that promotes disobedience to the law or such order.”.

by deleting paragraph (a) of the definition of “subversive document” in subsection (1) and substituting the following paragraphs:“(a)that has a tendency to excite persons in Singapore to attempt to procure in Singapore, the alteration (otherwise than by lawful means) of any matter established by law;

by inserting, immediately after subsection (4), the following subsection:“(5) A document is not considered as having the tendency mentioned in paragraph (a) or (aa) of the definition of “subversive document” in subsection (1) by reason only that it has a tendency —

to show that the Government has been misled or mistaken in any of its measures;

to point out errors or defects in the Government, in any written law or in the administration of justice with a view to the remedying of such error or defect;

to persuade citizens of Singapore or residents in Singapore to attempt to procure by lawful means the alteration of any matter in Singapore; or

to point out, with a view to their removal, any matters producing or having a tendency to produce feelings of ill‑will and enmity between different races or classes of the population of Singapore,if the document does not otherwise have the tendency mentioned in paragraph (a) or (aa) of that definition.”.

by deleting the definitions of “publication” and “words” and substituting the following definition:“ “publication” includes all written or printed matter and everything whether of a nature similar to written or printed matter or not containing any visible representation or by its form, shape or in any other manner capable of suggesting words or ideas, and every copy and reproduction or substantial reproduction of any publication;”; and

by deleting the full‑stop at the end of the definition of “warrant officer” and substituting a semi‑colon, and by inserting immediately thereafter the following definition:“ “words” includes any phrase, sentence or other consecutive number or combination of words, oral or written.”.

by deleting the words “, or sedition,” in subsection (4); and

by inserting, immediately after subsection (4), the following subsection:“(4A) Nothing in this section —

affects the power of a court to punish for contempt of court within the meaning of section 3 of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016; or

applies to an act that is an offence under section 267C, 298, 298A or 505 of the Penal Code, or section 17E or 17F of the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act.”.