Judgment Header
Latham v Credit Suisse First Boston [2000] SGCA 26
Court DecisionSGCA
[2000] SGCA 26
[2000] SGCA 26
Court of Appeal of Singapore15 May 2000CA 168/1999
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“dent to the written contract as compared to collateral contracts and warranties. In support of this proposition, the Singapore Court of Appeal in the case of Latham Scott v Credit Suisse First Boston [2000] SGCA 26 had the occasion to adjudicate on a similar provision in their section 94 (c ) of their Evidence Act: “19”
“atrimonial home, there was no uncertainty about the plaintiff’s rights. Similarly in Scott Latham v Credit Suisse First Boston [1999] SGHC 302 (upheld on appeal in Latham v Credit Suisse First Boston [2000] SGCA 26), Chan Seng Onn JC (as he then was) declined to make a declaratory order regarding the plaintiff’s wrongf”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 168/1999
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2000-05-15
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.