Judgment Header
Sim Teck Ho v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGCA 44
Loading…
[2000] SGCA 44
Court of Appeal of Singapore23 Aug 2000CA 11/2000
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“e controlled drug. This required proof of the accused’s physical control over the controlled drug and knowledge of the existence of thing in question, ie, the controlled drug itself: Sim Teck Ho v PP [2000] SGCA 44 at [13]. The fact that the accused was unconscious at the time the controlled drug was found on him did n”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Sim Teck Ho v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGCA 44
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 11/2000
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2000-08-23
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.