Judgment Header
Sim Teck Ho v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGCA 44
Court DecisionSGCA
[2000] SGCA 44
[2000] SGCA 44
Court of Appeal of Singapore23 Aug 2000CA 11/2000
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“e controlled drug. This required proof of the accused’s physical control over the controlled drug and knowledge of the existence of thing in question, ie, the controlled drug itself: Sim Teck Ho v PP [2000] SGCA 44 at [13]. The fact that the accused was unconscious at the time the controlled drug was found on him did n”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 11/2000
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2000-08-23
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.