Judgment Header
Shih Ching Chia James v Swee Tuan Kay [2002] SGCA 2
Court DecisionSGCA
[2002] SGCA 2
[2002] SGCA 2
Court of Appeal of Singapore10 Jan 2002Civil Appeal Nos 600047 & 600056 of 2001
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ring the course of the marriage: see, for example, BOR v BOS and another appeal [2018] SGCA 78 at [107], Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai Huah [2007] SGCA 21 at [31] and Shih Ching Chia James v Swee Tuan Kay [2002] SGCA 2 at [41]. It is important to recognise the context in which these discussions arose. If an adverse inferenc”
“ture from the default position that the date of valuation is the date closest to the ancillary matters hearing. Her counsel, Mr Darren Chan, compares her case to Shih Ching Chia James v Swee Tuan Kay [2002] SGCA 2 (“Shih Ching Chia”) and my decision in WJG v WJH [2022] SGHCF 28 (“WJG v WJH”). Mr Chan claims that the co”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal Nos 600047 & 600056 of 2001
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2002-01-10
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.