Judgment Header
Alagappa Subramanian v Chidambaram s/o Alagappa [2003] SGCA 20
Court DecisionSGCA
[2003] SGCA 20
[2003] SGCA 20
Court of Appeal of Singapore6 May 2003CA 106/2002
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The defendant relies on Alagappa Subramanian v Chidambaram s/o Alagappa [2003] SGCA 20 (“Alagappa”) to support her position. She says that Court of Appeal in that case held that there was a resulting trust “because” the trust funds were deposited into the trustee’s sole account. This i”
“will not reverse the findings of fact made by the judge of first instance unless such findings are plainly wrong or against the weight of the evidence (Alagappa Subramanian v Chidambaram s/o Alagappa [2003] SGCA 20 at [13]). On the facts, the evidence of Dr Bell that he had advised Mr Sheng of the risk of implant failu”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 106/2002
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2003-05-06
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.