Judgment Header
Muhammad bin Kadar and another v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 32
Loading…
[2011] SGCA 32
Court of Appeal of Singapore5 Jul 2011Criminal Appeal No 8 of 2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“nvited to adopt the approach taken by the Singapore Court of Appeal (the apex 10 court of Singapore) in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan & Ors v. PP [2010] SGCA 33 and Muhammad bin Kadar and Another v. PP [2011] SGCA 32 with regard to the issue of common intention under s. 34 of the Penal Code. 15 [56] As learned counsel re”
“by the Singapore Court of Appeal (the apex court of Singapore) in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan and others v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGCA 33 and 1955 Muhammad bin Kadar and another v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 32 with regard to the issue of common intention under s 34 of the Penal Code.” 1960 [42] Pada hemat kami, HM”
“by the Singapore Court of Appeal (the apex court of Singapore) in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan and others v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGCA 33 and 1955 Muhammad bin Kadar and another v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 32 with regard to the issue of common intention under s 34 of the Penal Code.” 1960 [42] Pada hemat kami, HM”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Muhammad bin Kadar and another v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 32
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Appeal No 8 of 2009
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-07-05
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.