Judgment Header
Lena Leowardi v Yeap Cheen Soo [2014] SGCA 57
Loading…
[2014] SGCA 57
Court of Appeal of Singapore26 Nov 2014Civil Appeal No 55 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ase of Tan Aik Teck (supra) although there was no promissory note made for instance stating the amount of debt and date of repayment as decided in one Singapore case of Lena Leowardi v Yeap Cheen Soo [2014] SGCA 57 at paragraph 25. A promissory note is a written promise to pay money between lender and borrower where no”
“Teck (supra) although there was no promissory note made for instance stating the amount of debt and date of repayment as decided in a Singapore Court of Appeal case of Lena Leowardi v Yeap Cheen Soo [2014] SGCA 57, at paragraph 25. A promissory note is a written promise to pay money between lender and borrower where no”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Lena Leowardi v Yeap Cheen Soo [2014] SGCA 57
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 55 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-11-26
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.