Judgment Header
Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 61
Court DecisionSGCA
[2014] SGCA 61
[2014] SGCA 61
Court of Appeal of Singapore27 Nov 2014Civil Appeal No 39 of 2014 (Summons No 1563 of 2014)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 6 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
6Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ned by reference to the relevant statute itself. The High Court’s jurisdiction depends on the nature of the judicial function it exercises (Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v. Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 61 at (50)). The correct position was succinctly put in Eric Chia (supra) at [12]; ... to determine whether”
“by reference to the relevant statute itself. The High Court’s jurisdiction depends on the nature of the judicial function it exercises (Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource 6 Interior Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 61 at [50]). The correct position was succinctly put in Eric Chia (supra) at [12]: “... to determine whether or”
- CitedHUP SENG PERUSAHAAN MAKANAN (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) LAM SOON EDIBLE OIL SDN BHD (24IP-1-01/2019)Case
“ined by reference to the relevant statute itself. The High Court’s jurisdiction depends on the nature of the judicial function it exercises (Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 61 at [50]). The correct position was succinctly put in Eric Chia (supra) at [12]: “... to determine whether”
“ined by reference to the relevant statute itself. The High Court’s jurisdiction depends on the nature of the judicial function it exercises (Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 61 at [50]). The correct position was succinctly put in Eric Chia (supra) at [12]: “... to determine whether”
- Cited1. ) ROLLS ROYCE PLC v 1. ) SAUJANA HOTEL SDN BHD (WA-24IP-16-07/2018 & WA-24IP-17-07/2018)Case
“ined by reference to the relevant statute itself. The High Court’s jurisdiction depends on the nature of the judicial function it exercises (Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 61 at [50]). The correct position was succinctly put in Eric Chia (supra) at [12]: “... to determine whether”
Show 1 moreShow fewer
“ned by reference to the relevant statute itself. The High Court’s jurisdiction depends on the nature of the judicial function it exercises (Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 61 at [50]). The correct position was succinctly put in Eric Chia (supra) at [12]: “... to determine whether”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 39 of 2014 (Summons No 1563 of 2014)
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-11-27
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.