Judgment Header
Neo Boh Tan v Ng Kim Whatt [2000] SGHC 31
Court DecisionSGHC
[2000] SGHC 31
[2000] SGHC 31
General Division of the High Court of Singapore7 Mar 2000OS 74/2000
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The court in Neo Boh Tan v Ng Kim Whatt [2000] SGHC 31 (“Neo”) adopted the interpretation of Cheong ([48] supra) as set out in Sitiawah, observing as follows (at [17]–[18]):”
“Cheong Yoke Kuen and Sitiawah were considered by Judith Prakash J (as she then was) in the High Court decision of Neo Boh Tan v Ng Kim Whatt [2000] SGHC 31 (“Neo Boh Tan”). Similarly to Sitiawah, this case involved an HDB flat which had been jointly purchased by a mother and her son. Subsequently, the relationship betw”
“ncial contributions were taken into consideration in the determination of a party’s share of the disputed property. For example, the resulting trust analysis was applied in Neo Boh Tan v Ng Kim Whatt [2000] SGHC 31. In the present case, the Family Court had disregarded the financial contributions of the brothers, which”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: OS 74/2000
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2000-03-07
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.