[2000] SGHC 53

“2010] EWCA Civ 819 at [33]; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd [2006] RPC 2 at 46; see also Institut Pasteur and another v Genelabs Diagnostics Pte Ltd and another [2000] SGHC 53 (“Genelabs (HC)”) at [194]). For the avoidance of doubt, the formation of such a notional team does not m”

“ch. First, the offer must not only be made in Singapore but must also relate to the use of the infringing process in Singapore (Institut Pasteur and Another v Genelabs Diagnostics Pte Ltd and Another [2000] SGHC 53 at [225]; Law of Intellectual Property of Singapore at para 33.2.2). There is unfortunately little eviden”

“has been made available in the public domain, even if no one has inspected it: see Ng-Loy ([52] supra) at para 30.1.29, citing Institut Pasteur and Another v Genelabs Diagnostics Pte Ltd and Another [2000] SGHC 53 at [188] and Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting (trading as Soon Heng Digitax) [2011] 3 SLR”

“o requirement that the information must actually have been accessed or come to the attention of an actual member of the public (Institut Pasteur and another v Genelabs Diagnostics Pte Ltd and another [2000] SGHC 53 (“Genelabs (HC))” at [188] per Tay Yong Kwang JC (as he then was)). The focus is on whether the informati”

“fied even if the prior art was disclosed only to a single member of the public, unless such disclosure was given in confidence: Institut Pasteur and Another v Genelabs Diagnostics Pte Ltd and Another [2000] SGHC 53 (“Institut Pasteur”) at [188]. In addition, the requirement will still be satisfied even if no one has in”