Judgment Header
Gunapathy Muniandy v James Khoo and Others [2001] SGHC 165
Court DecisionSGHC
[2001] SGHC 165
[2001] SGHC 165
General Division of the High Court of Singapore4 Jul 2001Suit 1768/1999
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“S Y Technology and another appeal [2008] 2 SLR(R) 491 at [69]). In discharging this duty, experts must not only be impartial, but must also appear to be so (Gunapathy Muniandy v Khoo James and others [2001] SGHC 165 at [12.16]). For this reason, experts should disclose “without any prompting” any existing or recent rel”
“At this point, it would be useful to recall the following dictum of G P Selvam J from Gunapathy Muniandy v James Khoo and others [2001] SGHC 165 (at [12.3]):”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 1768/1999
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2001-07-04
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.