Judgment Header
Gunapathy Muniandy v James Khoo and Others [2001] SGHC 165
Loading…
[2001] SGHC 165
General Division of the High Court of Singapore4 Jul 2001Suit 1768/1999
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“S Y Technology and another appeal [2008] 2 SLR(R) 491 at [69]). In discharging this duty, experts must not only be impartial, but must also appear to be so (Gunapathy Muniandy v Khoo James and others [2001] SGHC 165 at [12.16]). For this reason, experts should disclose “without any prompting” any existing or recent rel”
“At this point, it would be useful to recall the following dictum of G P Selvam J from Gunapathy Muniandy v James Khoo and others [2001] SGHC 165 (at [12.3]):”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Gunapathy Muniandy v James Khoo and Others [2001] SGHC 165
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 1768/1999
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2001-07-04
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.