Judgment Header
Farida Begam d/o Mohd Artham v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 333
Loading…
[2001] SGHC 333
General Division of the High Court of Singapore8 Nov 2001MA 149/2001
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“First, Perinba is an interested witness as she is the accused’s wife and loves him. Her exonerating evidence must thus be treated with caution (see Farida Begam d/o Mohd Artham v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 333 (“Farida”) at [13]).”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Farida Begam d/o Mohd Artham v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 333
Case Metadata
Case No: MA 149/2001
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2001-11-08
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.