Judgment Header
Protax Co-operative Society Ltd v Toh Teng Seng and Another [2001] SGHC 84
Court DecisionSGHC
[2001] SGHC 84
[2001] SGHC 84
General Division of the High Court of Singapore30 Apr 2001Suit 640/2000
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“3 at 534. Although a landlord would usually choose between the two methods of forfeiture, he is not precluded from using both methods at the same time: Protax Co‑operative Society Ltd v Toh Teng Seng [2001] SGHC 84 at [94]. 32 Protax Co‑operative Society Ltd v Toh Teng Seng [2001] SGHC 84 at [59]. 33 Billson v Resident”
“e conditions contained in the forfeiture clause in the lease are satisfied and the right has not in the meantime been waived by the lessor (Protax Co-operative Society Ltd v Toh Teng Seng and another [2001] SGHC 84 at [18] and Kataria v Safeland plc [1998] 1 EGLR 39 at 41). In this case, cl 6.1 dispensed with the requi”
“Campbell relies on the decision of the High Court in Protax Co-operative Society Ltd v Toh Teng Seng [2001] SGHC 84 (“Protax”). There, Chan Seng Onn JC (as he then was) stated at [24]:”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 640/2000
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2001-04-30
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.