[2001] SGHC 87

“his or her position if the notice of appeal could not be lodged at all (see Aberdeen Asset Management at [44], citing the High Court decision of S3 Building Services Pte Ltd v Sky Technology Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 87 at [67]–[69]).”

“rring to Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd at [44]). The prejudice must be one that “cannot be compensated by an appropriate order as to costs” (S3 Building Services Pte Ltd v Sky Technology Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 87 at [69], referred to in Lee Hsien Loong at [27]).”

“He [2024] SGHC 243 at [10], citing Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd and another v Fraser & Neave Ltd and others [2001] 3 SLR(R) 355 at [44] and S3 Building Services Pte Ltd v Sky Technology Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 87 at [67]–[69]). Thus, for example, the fact that the appeal may then succeed or the hearing of the appeal”

“respondents, it is important to note that the prejudice suffered must be one that cannot be compensated by costs (Lee Hsien Loong at [27], citing S3 Building Services Pte Ltd v Sky Technology Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 87 at [69]). To that end, the prejudice must have been constituted by some form of irreversible or permanent”