Judgment Header
Tan Chin Seng and Others v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd [2002] SGHC 278
Court DecisionSGHC
[2002] SGHC 278
[2002] SGHC 278
General Division of the High Court of Singapore22 Nov 2002Suit 1441/2001
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“the person expressing the opinion did not hold it, or could not, as a reasonable man having his knowledge of the facts, honestly have held it (see Tan Chin Seng and others v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd [2002] SGHC 278 at [22]–[23]). Thus, a statement of opinion may in certain circumstances involve a statement of fact tha”
“pitch. A representation of this nature does not fit neatly alongside the “[e]ulogistic commendation[s]” that are commonly recognised as puff: see Tan Chin Seng and others v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd [2002] SGHC 278 at [33].”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 1441/2001
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2002-11-22
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.