Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Rahmat Bin Abdullah and Another [2003] SGHC 206
Court DecisionSGHC
[2003] SGHC 206
[2003] SGHC 206
General Division of the High Court of Singapore11 Sept 2003CC 34/2003
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The effect of a reduction from the actual weight of drugs and the avoidance of the death penalty on sentencing has been considered judicially. In PP v Rahmat Bin Abdullah and Another [2003] SGHC 206 Choo Han Teck J stated (at [9]) that:”
“, and a higher sentence be imposed if the court finds it appropriate”. The Judge supported this proposition by reference to three High Court cases (Public Prosecutor v Rahmat bin Abdullah and another [2003] SGHC 206 (“Rahmat”), Public Prosecutor v Kisshahllini a/p Paramesuvaran [2016] 3 SLR 261 (“Kisshahllini”), and Pu”
“The second decision is Public Prosecutor v Rahmat Bin Abdullah and another [2003] SGHC 206, which concerned drug trafficking by two accused persons in a quantity that attracted a minimum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. Both accused persons were sentenced to 2”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CC 34/2003
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2003-09-11
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.