Judgment Header
Grossner Jens v Raffles Holdings Ltd [2003] SGHC 290
Court DecisionSGHC
[2003] SGHC 290
[2003] SGHC 290
General Division of the High Court of Singapore28 Nov 2003Suit 1371/2002
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“to be made”. (Emphasis added) 22 [31] Chua Lee Ming J concluded his judgment saying, “The alleged oral agreement is therefore void for uncertainty.” (See also: Grossner Jens v. Raffles Holdings Ltd [2003] SGHC 290; and Rudhra Minerals Pte Ltd v. MRI Trading Pte Ltd (formerly known as CWT Integrated Services Pte Ltd) [2”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 1371/2002
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2003-11-28
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.