[2004] SGHC 147

“d as the plaintiff in Eng Ah Wah only required conservative treatment for his head injuries, while Sun had to undergo emergency operations immediately after the accident. Ang Siam Hua v Teo Cheng Hoe [2004] SGHC 147 (“Ang Siam Hua”) is, in my view a more appropriate reference. In that case, an amount of S$50,000 was aw”

“The third case was Ang Siam Hua v Teo Cheng Hoe [2004] SGHC 147. There, an assistant registrar awarded $10,000 for loss of amenities to compensate the plaintiff for the combined effect of individual disabilities on the overall function of the body even though she”

“Srinivasan submits that a sum of $20,000 should be awarded for the concomitant open fracture of the right humerus (“Open Fracture”). Mr Srinivasan relied on the cases of Ang Siam Hua v Teo Cheng Hoe [2004] SGHC 147 and Tan Shwu Leng v Singapore Airlines [2001] SGCA 70 where the court awarded $15,000 and $13,000 respect”

“The plaintiff tenders two authorities in support of its position. In Ang Siam Hua v Teo Cheng Hoe [2004] SGHC 147 (“Ang Siam Hua”), the court awarded $2,000 for pneumonia (at [15]) and $6,000 for a tracheotomy scar and multiple abrasions and scars across various parts of the body. The figure of $6,000 cannot be”

“a separate claim for her partial loss of vision. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that a sum of $15,000 is appropriate based on the 2010 Guidelines and the precedent of Ang Siam Hua v Teo Cheng Hoe [2004] SGHC 147. I have already dealt with the plaintiff’s partial loss of vision and compensated her for that under the”