Judgment Header
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Other Applications [2004] SGHC 155
Loading…
[2004] SGHC 155
General Division of the High Court of Singapore28 Jul 2004OS 284/2004, 285/2004, 286/2004, 287/2004, RA 111/2004, 112/2004, 113/2004, 114/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 35 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“very is not necessary either for disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs. In Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pasific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155 the High Court of Singapore when considering a provision in pari materia with our O 24 r 8 stated as fol”
“re relevant or an assertion the documents are necessary because they are relevant is not enough (Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pasific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155). [18] I find that the matters sought in prayers (2) and (4) are not “documents” as envisaged by the pri”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“very is not necessary either for disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs. In Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pasific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155 the High Court of Singapore when considering a provision in parimateria with our O.24 r. 8 stated as fol”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 page 27 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated a”
“er approach to the question of whether discovery is "necessary" may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 ("Bayerische ") where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follo”
“er approach to the question of whether discovery is "necessary" may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 ("Bayerische ") where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follo”
“er approach to the question of whether discovery is "necessary" may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 ("Bayerische") where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“er approach to the question of whether discovery is "necessary" may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 ("Bayerische") where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“er approach to the question of whether discovery is "necessary" may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 ("Bayerische") where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph 37 stated as follows: ‘Th”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“er approach to the question of whether discovery is "necessary" may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 ("Bayerische") where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“er approach to the question of whether discovery is "necessary" may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 ("Bayerische ") where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follo”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“n melibatkan isu-isu yang tidak relevan dibicarakan. Rujukan dibuat kepada kes Bayerischie Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications, HC (Singapore) [2004] SGHC 155. [9] Hujah beliau selanjutnya defendan gagal menspesifikasikan dokumen-dokumen yang dipohon. Deskripsi d”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“ery is not necessary either for disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs. In Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pasific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155 the High Court of Singapore when considering a provision in pari materia with our O. 24 r. stated as fol”
“ocuments are necessary because they are relevant will not be enough. (Emphasis added)” [27] In Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank Ag v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Other Applications [2004] SGHC 155 referred to in Malaysia Debt Ventures Berhad (supra), Her Ladyship Belinda Ang Saw Ean J (as she then was”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 26 ii. Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Other Applications [2004] SGHC 155 yang memutuskan seperti berikut: “The court is, by O. 24 r. 7, concerned with the discretion to refuse di”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is ‘necessary’ may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (‘Bayerische’) where the High Court of Singapore at para [37] stated as follows: “T”
“14. Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155 (HC).”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; ; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as foll”
“per approach to the question of whether discovery is “necessary” may be gleaned from the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR (R) 39 (“Bayerische”) where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph [37] stated as follow”
“disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs." [10] Mahkamah dirujuk kepada kes Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Other Applications [2004] SGHC 155 di mana Mahkamah memutuskan bahawa: "The ultimate test is whether discovery is necessary for disposing fai”
“follows: “[42] On the issue of necessity, I have taken the liberty of referring to the case of Bqyerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155 where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph 37 stated as follows: ‘The ultimate test is whether discov”
“follows: “[42] On the issue of necessity, I have taken the liberty of referring to the case of Bqyerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155 where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph 37 stated as follows: “The ultimate test is whether discove”
“Saw Jin v Hwang Sze Yun & Anor [2018] MLJU 367, Nantha Balan J (now JCA) applied the principles of the Singapore case of Bayerische Hypo-und Verinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2004] SGHC 155 where he held as follows: "[42]. On the issue of necessity, I have taken the liberty of referring to the”
“berikut: [42] On the issue of necessity, I have taken the liberty of referring to the case of Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155 where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph 37 stated as follows: "The ultimate test is whether discove”
“v. Asia Pacific Braweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications S/N f1uhdOmiiUuZ3hdFAAhN6g **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 12 [2004] SGHC 155 where the High Court of Singapore at para 37 stated as follows: "The ultimate test is whether discovery is”
“ures Berhad v Platinum Techsolve Sdn Bhd & Ors [2020] MLJU 1421, CA, where it cited and followed Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155; [2004] 4 SLR 580”
“follows: “[42] On the issue of necessity, I have taken the liberty of referring to the case of Bqyerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG v. Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other applications [2004] SGHC 155 where the High Court of Singapore at paragraph 37 stated as follows: “The ultimate test is whether discov”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Other Applications [2004] SGHC 155
Case Metadata
Case No: OS 284/2004, 285/2004, 286/2004, 287/2004, RA 111/2004, 112/2004, 113/2004, 114/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-07-28
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.