Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v DU [2004] SGHC 238
Loading…
[2004] SGHC 238
General Division of the High Court of Singapore25 Oct 2004CC 14/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“the sole basis that the charges were framed in a broad range of dates. Such an argument, if valid, would mean that very few cases of sexual abuse against young victims would proceed to trial (PP v DU [2004] SGHC 238 (“DU”) at [22]), since a young victim’s concept of time may be less reliable (DU at [22] and PP v BZT [2”
“example, by way of alibi or absence from the country or home). As rightly pointed out by the Prosecution, such a defence has been raised before the High Court and rejected. In Public Prosecutor v DU [2004] SGHC 238 (“DU”), the accused faced the following two charges:”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v DU [2004] SGHC 238
Case Metadata
Case No: CC 14/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-10-25
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.