Judgment Header
Schindler Lifts (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Paya Ubi Industrial Park Pte Ltd and Another [2004] SGHC 34
Court DecisionSGHC
[2004] SGHC 34
[2004] SGHC 34
General Division of the High Court of Singapore24 Feb 2004Suit 457/2002
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In Schindler Lifts (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Paya Ubi Industrial Park Pte Ltd and Another [2004] SGHC 34 (“Schindler Lifts”), Judith Prakash J (as she then was) held at [14] that:”
“We also cannot, with respect, agree with the Judge’s reliance on Schindler’s Lifts (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Paya Ubi Industrial Park Pte Ltd and Another [2004] SGHC 34 (“Schindler’s Lifts”) (Judgment at [322]). As Mr Ser rightly points out, that case simply was not concerned with a dispute over the issuance of a CC before”
“to the changes in the obligations and rights of various parties inter se”: per Judith Prakash J (as she then was) in Schindler Lifts (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Paya Ubi Industrial Park Pte Ltd and another [2004] SGHC 34 at [14]. Prakash J’s observation that “(s)uch consent is usually evidenced by a written novation agreemen”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 457/2002
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-02-24
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.