Judgment Header
Ting Heng Mee v Sin Sheng Fresh Fruit Pte Ltd [2004] SGHC 43
[2004] SGHC 43
General Division of the High Court of Singapore26 Feb 2004Suit 586/2003, NA 93/2003
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 6 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“precedents in which the High Court awarded damages for collarbone injuries (examples include Ong Zern Chern Philip v Wong Siang Meng [2004] SGHC 256 and Ting Heng Mee v Sin Sheng Fresh Fruits Pte Ltd [2004] SGHC 43). However, these precedents did not advance the plaintiff’s case. The sums awarded by the High Court in t”
“accordance with other precedents for memory and cognitive impediment such as Er Hung Boon v Law Shyan En (DC Suit No 1567 of 1997) - $20,000 awarded and Ting Heng Mee v Sin Sheng Fresh Fruit Pte Ltd [2004] SGHC 43 - $25,000 awarded.”
“In respect of this claim, Mr Thiru relies on Yip Kok Meng Calvin (a minor) v Lek Yong Han (Yip Ai Puay, third party) [1993] SGHC 21 and Ting Heng Mee v Sin Sheng Fresh Fruits [2004] SGHC 43, where sums of $8000 and $7000, respectively, were awarded, to support his submission that damages be assessed in the sum of $5000”
“inopathy and a near full thickness tear of the anterior to mid fibres of the left supraspinatus tendon. Counsel for the plaintiffs drew a comparison with Ting Heng Mee v Sin Shing Fresh Fruit Pte Ltd [2004] SGHC 43 (“Ting Heng Mee”), where the claimant was awarded $13,500 for a partial tear of the supraspinatus tendon”
“defendant relies on Chin Swey Min (a patient suing by his wife and next friend Lim Siew Lee) v Nor Nizar bin Mohamed [2004] SGHC 27 (“Chin Swey Min”) and Ting Heng Mee v Sin Sheng Fresh Fruit Pte Ltd [2004] SGHC 43 (“Ting Heng Mee”). In Chin Swey Min, the plaintiff was a 38-year-old supervisor at the time of his accide”
“(c) In Ting Heng Mee v Sin Sheng Fresh Fruits [2004] SGHC 43, the 68 year old (at the time of the accident) barber, with a salary of $700 per month, was awarded $2, 500 for his LEC. The court found that the plaintiff was a springy and energetic 70 year old man”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Ting Heng Mee v Sin Sheng Fresh Fruit Pte Ltd [2004] SGHC 43
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 586/2003, NA 93/2003
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-02-26
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.