Judgment Header
Re Econ Corp Ltd (in provisional liquidation) (No 2) [2004] SGHC 49
Loading…
[2004] SGHC 49
General Division of the High Court of Singapore5 Mar 2004OS 1791/2003
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 7 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“h cross-examination as it will have a bearing on the reasonableness of the remuneration quantum. The Defendant relies on the Singapore High Court case of Re Econ Corp Ltd (in provisional liquidation) [2004] SGHC 49, arguing that appointments in insolvency matters are personal to the office holders and should not be int”
“d (see Perumahan NCK Sdn Bhd v Mega Sakti Sdn Bhd [2005] 7 MLJ 389, Emiprima Sdn Bhd v Wonderful Castle Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) [2023] 5 MLJ 695, Re Econ Corp Ltd (In Provisional Liquidation) (No 2) [2004] SGHC 49 and Ong Kwong Yew & Ors v Ong Ching Chee & Ors and other appeals [2018] MLJU 2189).”
“ined. [109] Further guidance on this issue of remuneration in respect of time costs is to be found in the decision of the Singapore High Court in Re Econ Corp Ltd (In Provisional Liquidation) (No 2) [2004] SGHC 49. In that case, Justice V K Rajah (as he then was) held, inter alia, that:”
“ined. [109] Further guidance on this issue of remuneration in respect of time costs is to be found in the decision of the Singapore High Court in Re Econ Corp Ltd (In Provisional Liquidation) (No 2) [2004] SGHC 49. In that case, Justice V K Rajah (as he then was) held, inter alia, that:”
“76. In determining what is fair and reasonable, reference can be made to the Singapore High Court case of Re Econ Corp Ltd (in provisional liquidation) (No 2) [2004] SGHC 49. That is a decision which was referred to by the Court of Appeal in Emiprima (supra). There, the Singapore High Court set out the following guidin”
“ined. [109] Further guidance on this issue of remuneration in respect of time costs is to be found in the decision of the Singapore High Court in Re Econ Corp Ltd (In Provisional Liquidation) (No 2) [2004] SGHC 49. In that case, Justice V K Rajah (as he then was) held, inter alia, that:-”
“ined. [109] Further guidance on this issue of remuneration in respect of time costs is to be found in the decision of the Singapore High Court in Re Econ Corp Ltd (In Provisional Liquidation) (No 2) [2004] SGHC 49. In that case, Justice V K Rajah (as he then was) held, inter alia, that:-”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Re Econ Corp Ltd (in provisional liquidation) (No 2) [2004] SGHC 49
Case Metadata
Case No: OS 1791/2003
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-03-05
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.