Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Chia Teck Leng [2004] SGHC 68
Court DecisionSGHC
[2004] SGHC 68
[2004] SGHC 68
General Division of the High Court of Singapore2 Apr 2004CC 12/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“t and erect the high walls of suspicion” and could “lead to ever more stringent checks … on honest businesses with the attendant impact in terms of time and costs” (Public Prosecutor v Chia Teck Leng [2004] SGHC 68 (“Chia Teck Leng”) at [42]). More importantly, it would severely tarnish Singapore’s reputation as a fina”
“the Prosecution additionally submitted that she had abused her position as the CEO of IPCO. This, the Prosecution submitted, was an aggravating factor recognised in Public Prosecutor v Chia Teck Leng [2004] SGHC 68 (“Chia Teck Leng”) where Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) said: “the banks believed, and rightly so, tha”
“d at the top tier of cheating cases in terms of amounts involved” (GD at [1009]). In doing so, the PDJ compared the present case with the facts and circumstances in Public Prosecutor v Chia Teck Leng [2004] SGHC 68 (“Chia Teck Leng”) and Public Prosecutor v Lim Beng Kim, Lulu [2023] SGDC 9 (“Lulu Lim”). As Chia Teck Le”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CC 12/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-04-02
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.