Judgment Header
Essar Steel Ltd v Bayerische Landesbank and Others [2004] SGHC 90
Court DecisionSGHC
[2004] SGHC 90
[2004] SGHC 90
General Division of the High Court of Singapore4 May 2004Suit 913/2003, RA 410/2003
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“for the second limb, the question of general principle decided for the first time, the test is that it must be a question of general principle: See Essar Steel Ltd v Bayerische Landesbank and others [2004] SGHC 90 at [27]. Finally, in respect of the third limb, the question of importance upon which further argument and”
“(A) 16 at [10]. As for the question of general principle decided for the first time, the key is that it must be a question of general principle: See Essar Steel Ltd v Bayerische Landesbank and others [2004] SGHC 90 at [27]. Finally, in respect of a question of importance upon which further argument and a decision of a”
“a detailed examination of matters relating to the OTS and the determination of nominal damages.” The Applicant relies on the High Court decision of Essar Steel Ltd v Bayerische Landesbank and others [2004] SGHC 90 at [14] which in turn cites Hoddle v CCF Construction [1992] 2 All ER 550 (“Hoddle”) at 550–551 for the pr”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 913/2003, RA 410/2003
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-05-04
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.