Judgment Header
Kaufman, Gregory Laurence and Others v Datacraft Asia Ltd and Another [2005] SGHC 174
Court DecisionSGHC
[2005] SGHC 174
[2005] SGHC 174
General Division of the High Court of Singapore22 Sept 2005OS 179/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“To support its arguments about Yang’s lack of independence, the Defendant cited the case Kaufman, Gregory Laurence and others v Datacraft Asia Ltd and another [2005] SGHC 174 (“Kaufman”) as an authority involving a “similar” situation. However, there was nothing “similar” at all about the facts in Kaufman. In that case”
“f such evidence should be limited: Vita Health Laboratories Pte Ltd and others v Pang Seng Meng [2004] 4 SLR(R) 162 (at [85]) and Kaufman, Gregory Laurence and others v Datacraft Asia Ltd and another [2005] SGHC 174 (at [33]). Nevertheless, I state that I arrived at my assessment on the lack of logic and coherence in M”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: OS 179/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2005-09-22
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.