Judgment Header
Lee Bee Kim Jennifer v Lim Yew Khang Cecil [2005] SGHC 209
Court DecisionSGHC
[2005] SGHC 209
[2005] SGHC 209
General Division of the High Court of Singapore9 Nov 2005D 2620/1997, RA 720026/2005, 720027/2005
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ers or their lifestyles, which it will have to examine thoroughly at the ancillaries stage, and thus the court will usually err on the side of conservatism (Lee Bee Kim Jennifer v Lim Yew Khang Cecil [2005] SGHC 209 at [7]).”
“full means to make a thorough investigation of the parties’ financial matters or their lifestyles, which it will have to examine thoroughly at the AM stage (Lee Bee Kim Jennifer v Lim Yew Khang Cecil [2005] SGHC 209 at [7]). Thus, even if the court were to now decide what constitutes reasonable expenses for the Wife, i”
“udge (the Judgment at [50]–[52]) and rejected (the Judgment at [56]). It is trite that there is a presumption that the decision appealed against is correct (Lee Bee Kim Jennifer v Lim Yew Khang Cecil [2005] SGHC 209 at [14], cited with approval by this court in Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai Huah [2007] SGCA 21 at [46]), and”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: D 2620/1997, RA 720026/2005, 720027/2005
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2005-11-09
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.