Judgment Header
Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy and Others [2006] SGHC 6
Loading…
[2006] SGHC 6
General Division of the High Court of Singapore18 Jan 2006Suit 217/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment and cited in 1 other later decision. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“s. I agree with the court’s finding that those cases – Wu Yang Construction Group Pte Ltd v Zhejiang Jinyi Group Co, Ltd and others [2006] 4 SLR(R) 451 and Yap Jeffrey Henry v Seow Timothy and Others [2006] SGHC 6 – were distinguishable and did not suggest that fraud is a necessary element for a claim of conspiracy.”
“Jinyi Group Co, Ltd and others [2006] 4 SLR(R) 451 – but that appears to be a form of deceit on the facts. Another case in which fraud was referred to was Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy and others [2006] SGHC 6 but this case was concerned with fraud in the context of s 340 of the Companies Act. A dishonest act alone”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy and Others [2006] SGHC 6
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 217/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2006-01-18
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.