Judgment Header
Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy and Others [2006] SGHC 6
Court DecisionSGHC
[2006] SGHC 6
[2006] SGHC 6
General Division of the High Court of Singapore18 Jan 2006Suit 217/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment and cited in 1 other later decision. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Distinguished by [2023] SGHC 273
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“s. I agree with the court’s finding that those cases – Wu Yang Construction Group Pte Ltd v Zhejiang Jinyi Group Co, Ltd and others [2006] 4 SLR(R) 451 and Yap Jeffrey Henry v Seow Timothy and Others [2006] SGHC 6 – were distinguishable and did not suggest that fraud is a necessary element for a claim of conspiracy.”
“Jinyi Group Co, Ltd and others [2006] 4 SLR(R) 451 – but that appears to be a form of deceit on the facts. Another case in which fraud was referred to was Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy and others [2006] SGHC 6 but this case was concerned with fraud in the context of s 340 of the Companies Act. A dishonest act alone”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 217/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2006-01-18
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.