Judgment Header
Lee Pauline Bradnam v Lee Thien Terh George [2006] SGHC 84
Loading…
[2006] SGHC 84
General Division of the High Court of Singapore18 May 2006OS 123/2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In this regard, the defendant relies on a decision of the learned assistant registrar (“AR”) in Lee Pauline Bradnam v Lee Thien Terh George [2006] SGHC 84 (“Lee Pauline Bradnam”) in which the issue of whether an order for periodic maintenance falls within the definition of a judgment within the REFJA was considered. Th”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Lee Pauline Bradnam v Lee Thien Terh George [2006] SGHC 84
Case Metadata
Case No: OS 123/2006
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2006-05-18
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.