Judgment Header
Au Kin Chung v Ho Kit Joo [2007] SGHC 150
Loading…
[2007] SGHC 150
General Division of the High Court of Singapore12 Sept 2007D 600778/2003, RAS 720091/2005
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The cases using an uplift approach cover a broad range. Uplifts ranging as high as 20% are not unprecedented. In Au Kin Chung v Ho Kit Joo [2007] SGHC 150, the High Court upheld the decision of the district judge who increased the wife’s share from 50% to 70% on account of husband’s failure to give full and frank discl”
“rse inference because it was not practicable to come to a finite sum for the Husband’s non-disclosure. The cases adopting an uplift approach cover a broad range of facts. In Au Kin Chung v Ho Kit Joo [2007] SGHC 150, the High Court upheld the decision of the district judge who increased the wife’s share from 50% to 70%”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Au Kin Chung v Ho Kit Joo [2007] SGHC 150
Case Metadata
Case No: D 600778/2003, RAS 720091/2005
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2007-09-12
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.