Judgment Header
Lau Hwee Beng and Another v Ong Teck Ghee [2007] SGHC 90
Court DecisionSGHC
[2007] SGHC 90
[2007] SGHC 90
General Division of the High Court of Singapore30 May 2007Suit 715/2006, SUM 5583/2006, 916/2007
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“its [2009] 4 SLR(R) 389 at [22]). In so doing, the Defendant’s position must be articulated with “sufficient particularity and supported by cogent evidence” (Lau Hwee Beng and Another v Ong Teck Ghee [2007] SGHC 90 at [33]). In the event that there are conflicts of cogent evidence, the evidence on behalf of the Defenda”
“umstances that call for further investigation. The defendant’s position must be articulated with “sufficient particularity and supported by cogent evidence” (Lau Hwee Beng and Another v Ong Teck Ghee [2007] SGHC 90 at [33], approved in B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd [2018] 4 SLR 1 at [5]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 715/2006, SUM 5583/2006, 916/2007
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2007-05-30
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.