Judgment Header
Tsu Soo Sin nee Oei Karen v Ng Yee Hoon [2008] SGHC 30
Court DecisionSGHC
[2008] SGHC 30
[2008] SGHC 30
General Division of the High Court of Singapore28 Feb 2008Suit 48/2007
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment and cited in 1 other later decision. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Distinguished by [2019] SGHC 289
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“the promisor but may move to a third party (The Law of Contract in Singapore (Andrew Phang Boon Leong gen ed) (Academy Publishing, 2012) at para 04.021, citing Tsu Soo Sin nee Oei Karen v Ng Yee Hoon [2008] SGHC 30 (“Tsu Soo Sin”) at [104]). RV1 submitted that Tsu Soo Sin is distinguishable. Whilst consideration may mo”
“m the promisee to the promisor. Instead, consideration may move from the promisee to a third party (see The Law of Contract in Singapore at para 04.021, citing Tsu Soo Sin nee Oei Karen v Ng Yee Hoon [2008] SGHC 30 (at [104])). Hence, even if it were Geniki Shipping/Aga-Intra, instead of LYC that directly benefitted fr”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 48/2007
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2008-02-28
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.