[2008] SGHC 31

“a right to the rescission of the contract (see Ross River Ltd & Another v Cambridge City Football Club Ltd [2007] EWHC 2115 at [193], accepted in Singapore in Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter v Gay Choon Ing [2008] SGHC 31 at [77]).”

“re unable to agree with the Judge that such a clause precludes Ding Auto’s shares from being held on trust. In this regard, we agree with the reasons given in Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter v Gay Choon Ing [2008] SGHC 31 at [36] (this point was not in issue on appeal in Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter and another ap”

“In Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter v Gay Choon Ing [2008] SGHC 31 , Belinda Ang Saw Ean J stated at [77]:”

“he rollover to the defendants. It must be underscored that fundamentally the 2015 Rental Agreement is a rental agreement. Further, using the examples cited in Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter v Gay Choon Ing [2008] SGHC 31 at [77], the relationship between the defendants and Fuji Xerox in the present case is far from analogous”

“he remedy of rescission. As held by the English Court of Appeal in Dunbar Bank plc v Nadeem and another [1998] 3 All ER 876 at 886 (cited by our High Court in Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter v Gay Choon Ing [2008] SGHC 31 (“Peter Loh”) at [101]), it is “well established that it is a condition of relief that the party obtainin”