Judgment Header
Ramesh s/o Ayakanno (suing by the committee of the person and the estate, Ramiah Naragatha Vally) v Chua Gim Hock [2008] SGHC 33
Court DecisionSGHC
[2008] SGHC 33
[2008] SGHC 33
General Division of the High Court of Singapore29 Feb 2008Suit 670/2002, RA 218/2007, 219/2007
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 5 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
5Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In the High Court decision of Ramesh s/o Ayakanno (suing by the committee of the person and the estate, Ramiah Naragatha Vally) v Chua Gim Hock [2008] SGHC 33 (“Ramesh s/o Ayakanno”), the claimant was 26 years old at the time of the accident. As a result of the accident, he was declared mentally disabled. He was unable”
“In Ramesh s/o Ayakanno (suing by the committee of the person and the estate, Ramiah Naragatha Vally) v Chua Gim Hock [2008] SGHC 33 (“Ramesh”), the victim was a 26-year-old lorry driver who had sustained multiple injuries including: severe head injuries to both sides of the brain; bilateral cord palsy; difficulty in sw”
“Secondly, in Ramesh s/o Ayakanno (suing by the committee of the person and the estate, Ramiah Naragatha Vally) v Chua Gim Hock [2008] SGHC 33 (“Ramesh”), the 26-year-old victim sustained multiple injuries including: severe head injuries to both sides of the brain; bilateral cord palsy; difficulty in swallowing; derange”
“In Ramesh s/o Ayakanno (suing by the committee of the person and the estate, Ramiah Naragatha Vally) v Chua Gim Hock [2008] SGHC 33 (“Ramesh”), the claimant was 26 years old at the time of the accident. As a result of the accident, he was declared mentally disabled. He was unable to move and talk, and required life-lon”
“The third case that counsel for the first defendant relies on is Ramesh s/o Ayakanno (suing by the committee of the person and the estate, Ramiah Naragatha Vally) v Chua Gim Hock [2008] SGHC 33 (“Ramesh s/o Ayakanno”). The plaintiff there was a 26-year-old lorry driver when he was injured in an accident. He sustained s”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 670/2002, RA 218/2007, 219/2007
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2008-02-29
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.