Judgment Header
Lim Quee Choo (suing as co-administratrix of the estate of Koh Jit Meng) and Another v David Rasif and Another [2008] SGHC 36
Court DecisionSGHC
[2008] SGHC 36
[2008] SGHC 36
General Division of the High Court of Singapore10 Mar 2008Suit 2/2007, SUM 5455/2007
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“s but because of some non-adherence to some procedural rule” [emphasis in original] (see Lim Quee Choo (suing as co-administratrix of the estate of Koh Jit Meng) and Another v David Rasif and Another [2008] SGHC 36 at [89]). The same principles should underlie both Orders.”
“follow any of the rules of procedure (see Evans v Bartlam [1937] AC 473 at 480, cited in Lim Quee Choo (suing as co-administratrix of the estate of Koh Jit Meng) and another v David Rasif and another [2008] SGHC 36 at [60]).”
“say that to the extent that my views differ from those of the learned Judge in COSCO, they are made in the spirit of these observations of AR Goh Yihan (as he then was) in Lim Quee Choo v David Rasif [2008] SGHC 36 (“Lim Quee Choo”) which I respectfully adopt (at [59]):”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 2/2007, SUM 5455/2007
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2008-03-10
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.