[2009] SGHC 13

“intention to submit the substance of any dispute to the Singapore courts for resolution. In his arguments, Mr Bhasi relied on the decision of PT Tri-MG Intra Asia Airlines v Norse Air Charter Limited [2009] SGHC 13 (“Norse Air”).”

“the only local decision addressing the construction of a contract containing both jurisdiction and arbitration clauses appears to be that of PT Tri-MG Intra Asia Airlines v Norse Air Charter Limited [2009] SGHC 13 (“PT Tri-MG”).”

“n apparent inconsistency the Judge resolved by construing the jurisdiction clause as a reference to the lex arbitri, applying the approach in PT Tri-MG Intra Asia Airlines v Norse Air Charter Limited [2009] SGHC 13 (“Norse Air”). The Second Agency Agreement contained a Singapore EJ clause. However, it was unnecessary t”

“v BXI [2020] 1 SLR 1043 (“BXH”), which dealt with a contract containing both a jurisdiction agreement and an arbitration agreement (see also PT Tri-MG Intra Asia Airlines v Norse Air Charter Limited [2009] SGHC 13; Paul Smith Ltd v H&S International Holding Inc [1991] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 127). The Court of Appeal opined that”

“P. T. Tri-M.G. Intra Asia Airlines v Norse Air Charter Limited [2009] SGHC 13”