Judgment Header
Consistel Pte Ltd and Another v Farooq Nasir and Another [2009] SGHC 82
Court DecisionSGHC
[2009] SGHC 82
[2009] SGHC 82
General Division of the High Court of Singapore7 Apr 2009Suit 729/2008, RA 11/2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“claimant would have to first seek permission to serve the originating process out of jurisdiction before resorting to substituted service: see Consistel Pte Ltd and another v Farooq Nasir and another [2009] SGHC 82 (at [30]) (“Consistel”). As noted in Consistel (at [35]), this general rule is subject to at least two ex”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 729/2008, RA 11/2009
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2009-04-07
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.